With the hanging of Cordelia, Kozintsev doesn’t really show it happen, just the aftermath, and focuses more on Lear’s reaction and “howling” more than the shock value of the hanging itself. In contrast, Brook practically gives us a close up of Cordelia’s neck breaking, and when Goneril kills herself, we also witness her action in a shocking close up. The increased physicality of Brook’s film on the whole could say something about his interpretation of the play; he relies more on the physical actions of the characters, whereas Kozintsev plays more into the pathos of the other characters’ reactions.
In the spirit of the Soviet Union, Kozintsev definitely
doesn’t neglect the poverty issue. Lear mentions something akin to this in the
play when he blames himself for the state of the poor, but in Kozintsev’s film
it is not just an aside; some of the strongest scenes of the film were the ones
where the troupes of beggars were walking along the desolate landscape
scavenging and wailing. The director’s choice to do this gives us a closer look
at not just the horrific state of the economy, but also the tragedy of the play
on the whole. Brook does this as well, with the black and white film set
against the remote landscape of Denmark, but he doesn’t include sheer volume of
poor people that surround the different scenes like Kozintsev does. When Edgar
and Edmund duel, in Kozintsev’s production it is a much more dramatic affair
not just because of its execution (with Edmund removing Edgar’s mask being much
more dramatic than Edgar removing his own in Brook’s version) but because of
the number of on-lookers that have all traveled throughout the play to this
moment of climax between the two brothers.
No comments:
Post a Comment