After exploring the Map of Early
Modern London and hearing Janelle Jenstad speak twice, I have been fascinated
by the notion that like-minded people naturally tend to congregate in the same
area and work together. Stow’s Survey, tended to characterize each ward
by the neighborhood’s dominant profession, evidenced by its portrayal of
Eastcheap as the meat district. Knowing
that there was some precedent for artistic collaboration, I went to MoEML with
this question: What was the nature of
artistic community and collaboration in London around this time? In other words, did artists of all
disciplines prefer to work independently, coming together only to vie for
patronage (as in the first scene of Timon),
or was there an active exchange of ideas (similar to that of the American
authors living in Paris in the 1920s)? I
expected, and somewhat hoped, to find confirmation of the latter, given
Shakespeare’s well-known collaborations.
Starting in the site’s
personography, I opened the pages for all artists, poets, writers, playwrights,
and patrons from the mid-sixteenth to the late seventeenth centuries. I hoped that I would find similar locations
reappearing in each of their biographies, as MoEML linked homes and restaurants
to famous occupants; alas, there was almost no commonality, giving me no easy
answer to my question. The only
reference I could find to artistic community was that of Alexander Pope and
Jonathan Swift, who, though active nearly a century after Shakespeare’s heyday, frequented one particular French restaurant on Abchurch Lane (not far from
Eastcheap). I found this amusing, since
it resonated with Timon’s artists
sharing a meal, and it brought to mind Lewis and Tolkien centuries later,
sitting in the Eagle and Child Pub in Oxford, reading each other drafts of
their novels.
Despite the small satisfaction I
drew from this discovery, I was generally disappointed with the results of my
research. I would not disregard it as a
valid research topic, since it does have the potential to yield wonderfully
surprising results; however, I would hesitate to pursue it for this particular
assignment, since its scope seems much too large for a mere five pages. If I were to continue this train of research,
I would adjust it to specifically look at the restaurants of London and what social interactions and exchanges
among artists, writers, and “commoners” took place there. I would search EEBO for mentions of specific
restaurants and their reputations in historical accounts of the city, and if
possible, I would love to read transcriptions of artists’ and writers’ personal
papers to see if they frequented particular establishments. Further examining this act of breaking bread
could not only illuminate texts like Timon
and King Henry with a fresh light,
but it could also enhance my understanding of artistic collaboration and the
writing process within a bustling community like Early Modern London.
No comments:
Post a Comment