For my Themester activity, I attended a mini-lecture and
presentation of the 2012 Danish film, The Hunt. Though the film was
almost entirely in Danish (with English subtitles), it was one of the most
engaging movies I've seen in a while.
The Hunt tells the tale of a warm and amicable small-town kindergarten
worker, Lukas, who is unjustly and rashly accused of sexual assault when an
upset young girl makes up a story after Lukas spurns her childish love
fantasies towards him. As usual, the child is believed, and soon the entire
close-knit community turns on him, metaphorically banishing him to the very
outskirts of society.
As part of the presentation, a Danish sociologist
focusing on social networks gave both an introduction and a concluding
discussion, in which he talked about the social phenomenon of conformity. Looking
back on it now, I am immediately drawn to the parallels in conformity between The Hunt and many of Shakespeare’s
works, especially Much Ado About Nothing,
where again an entire group of people instantly believe a fabricated tale based
off little to no evidence. While the subject of both stories are ultimately
redeemed, they both have to endure great hardships, as they are based in
cultures where one’s reputation is almost all they have.
Although created more than 400 years apart, the depicted problems of conformity in these works did not change, and therefore their message
is the same: conforming to major social beliefs can be hugely dangerous and
often unjust.
Joe, this is a great comparison; my only wish is that you develop it more. Is conformity the problem in Much Ado, or is it the structural sexism that makes women so easily suspected of adultery, with no opportunity to address their accusers? What's the difference? That is, how do we know when Shakespeare is criticizing a socially homogenous behavior, or the problem of social homogeneity? I am glad to read that you found the film so compelling; I wonder which of the works we have read you think it speaks most directly to.
ReplyDelete